Too obvious to matter. (Who likes a cover up?)

There are too many of these priorities that are too obvious (or vague) to disagree with. Prediction: Over 99% of the users will endorse this.

  • Only the majority of Congress is against this one.
  • Good job OBAMA on being for this type of transparency.

^ America, you need to hate pork barrel earmarks not only when its on paper, but also when it shows up in your district.

Talking points helpful to undeclared

YES – you need to hate pork barrel earmarks not only when its on paper, but ALSO WHEN IT SHOWS UP IN YOUR DISTRICT. Everyone opposes until they benefit. If your candidate runs on the “I brought $$$ back to our district” they are running on pork barrel spending. “Support me and I’ll make sure all the pork barrel $$’s are spent in our district.” Oppose it even when it means you don’t get $’s.

1 undeclared found this helpful.

You can find data on Federal earmarks, mostly beginning with FY 2008, here:
http://earmarks.omb.gov/

4 undeclareds found this helpful.

Recent activity on this talking point
TobyB marked Too obvious to matter. (Who likes a cover up?) helpful Mon Apr 06 11:12:22 -0700 2009 Comment
DougW marked Too obvious to matter. (Who likes a cover up?) helpful Sun Mar 29 12:31:39 -0700 2009 Comment
Johnny_Fairtax earned 1pc because undeclareds found Too obvious to matter. (Who likes a cover up?) helpful Wed Mar 25 11:03:22 -0700 2009 Comment
Johnny_Fairtax earned 1pc because endorsers found Too obvious to matter. (Who likes a cover up?) helpful Sun Jan 18 21:32:45 -0800 2009 Comment
sfjeff marked Too obvious to matter. (Who likes a cover up?) helpful Sun Jan 18 21:19:53 -0800 2009 Comment
Added Too obvious to matter. (Who likes a cover up?) to this priority Sat Dec 20 22:31:28 -0800 2008 Comment
Johnny_Fairtax marked Too obvious to matter. (Who likes a cover up?) helpful Sat Dec 20 22:31:28 -0800 2008 Comment

Authors
Icon_24 Johnny_Fairtax11pc
1 revision

Helpful to endorsers?
Chart?chco=009933,ccff99&cht=p&chd=s:9a&chs=50x50      4 YES
     0 NO
White House 2 is a multi-partisan network of 10557 citizens imagining how the White House might work if it was run completely democratically by thousands of people over the internet. It's free and all U.S. citizens can join.

We're setting priorities, collaborating on policy, and creating a massive database of 2867 talking points covering all sides of every important issue facing our country. Watch the video intro.

Getting involved is easy and fun. Just join and start setting your priorities, like a todo list. The more people who endorse a priority, the higher it rises in the charts. The more people who join the network, the more clout we will have with the President and the media.