Obama Administration endorses

Herbert Barry Woodrose posted a bulletin Tue Apr 07 18:40:09 -0700 2009 1 comment
Icon_24
3pc
Herbert Barry Woodrose (opposes) Tue Apr 07 18:40:09 -0700 2009

Obama can be shown – in no uncertain terms – to be ‘an intentional liar’. Let’s start with his attack on Clinton during the primaries on the funding of her campaign, partnered with his own egregious lying about ‘not taking a dime’ from Health lobbies. The facts are startling – he wasn’t just getting money, by the time it was all over he had received close to 3X the runner-up in that tally. I think ultimately Obama got something like $20 million – this, while my ‘lilberal, progressive’ friends were shining with hope, believing every word Obama uttered.

His team has already been to court numerous times – the documentation is growing exponentially – to safeguard some key measures of the Bush Doctrine, like ‘signing statements’. He directly opposed justice for Binyam Mohamed, and his administration did everything it could to not only silence the truth about the Bush Administrations actions in this and most of the other torture cases – but in fact have been shown to support key parts of these terrifying realities, for themselves. This is on top of the new ‘surge’ in Afghan, the subversion of a democracy we supposedly fought to put in place in Afghan, and the new money being pumped into mercenary forces by this administration. This Presidency is rightfully being Branded as “operation re-branding.”

Old Coot posted a bulletin Sat Mar 28 17:15:18 -0700 2009 2 comments
Icon_24
3pc
Old Coot (opposes) Sat Mar 28 17:15:18 -0700 2009

I was poking fun at the anti-war idiots during the Bush administration. We should be calling Obama the ‘Black Bush’. Afghanistan is Obama’s war. So much for the democrat dove.

Hidden because yourownpersonalS deleted their account. show
Old Coot posted a bulletin Sat Mar 28 17:05:45 -0700 2009 13 comments
Icon_24
3pc
Old Coot Sat Mar 28 17:05:45 -0700 2009

Really? Wow oh wow!

Better yet, Stop the Obama Afgan war now. Mr. President stop sending our young men and women to Afghanistan to be killed. You opposed the war and senseless killing in Iraq; well, oppose the senseless killing of Americans in Afghanistan. Let the Europeans do their own fighting for a change. Yes?

This is another red herring, a sham and nothing more than pure political obfuscations and nothing more than another ‘apple pie, mom and country cliche’. It means nothing. Thus I oppose it.

Hidden because yourownpersonalS deleted their account. show
Hidden because yourownpersonalS deleted their account. show
Peacenik posted a bulletin Wed Mar 25 13:03:40 -0700 2009 4 comments
Icon_24
0pc
Peacenik (opposes) Wed Mar 25 13:03:40 -0700 2009

The key to defeating Al-Qaeda is not hunting them down and killing them. The key is co-opting them, making their movement pointless, and making them feel disillusioned. Hunting down and killing Al-Qaeda members only creates more Al-Qaeda members.

Icon_24
170pc
nordwind Wed Mar 25 13:12:59 -0700 2009

Can you offer the people in Saudi Arabia (for example) a better government, let’s say a democratic government (with civil rights) instead of what they have so that their extremists may not want to follow Al-Qaeda? What are you going to offer that is better and make “their movement pointless”?

Icon_24
0pc
Peacenik (opposes) Wed Mar 25 14:06:35 -0700 2009

wow if I had that answer I would expect to be making a lot more money than minium wage thats for sure. I honestly dont know what that is, but I firmly believe the tactic of hunting and killing terrorists doesnt work. Look at the war on terror, its goal was to eliminate terrorists and terrorism, but both have dramatically increased since the “war” began.

Icon_24
170pc
nordwind Wed Mar 25 14:12:24 -0700 2009

The oil monarchs are in charge of the oil and the Government and they make deals with the oil companies and the consumers pay for expensive oil. Peeple are to be maintained in line and under control of the monarchy. You said that we need to make their (Al-Qaeda’s) movement pointless, etc. well, what’s the plan that will work?

monkey posted a bulletin Wed Mar 18 10:24:36 -0700 2009 1 comment
Icon_24
3pc
monkey (endorses) Wed Mar 18 10:24:36 -0700 2009

It’s later than you think. When I was memorizing the “Apostles’ Creed”, our president? was reading the Qur’an memorizing the way of Allah, which is written up in The Muslim Brotherhood “Project” Document. Research and change your priorty to SHUT DOWN JIHAD CAMPS IN THE USA NOW.

Hidden because yourownpersonalS deleted their account. show
Johnny_Fairtax endorsed at priority #4 Sat Dec 20 21:24:29 -0800 2008 1 comment
Icon_24
11pc
Johnny_Fairtax (endorses) Sat Dec 20 21:24:42 -0800 2008

Duh.

Terry4FairTax posted a comment Fri Nov 28 09:36:13 -0800 2008 1 comment
Icon_24
2pc
Terry4FairTax Fri Nov 28 09:36:51 -0800 2008

I would have to seriously see if this is a real national security risk, or a worldwide propaganda.

Obama Administration first suggested this priority Thu Nov 06 14:28:02 -0800 2008 1 comment
Icon_24
8pc
Obama Administration (endorses) Thu Nov 06 14:28:31 -0800 2008

We will responsibly end the war in Iraq and focus on the right battlefield in Afghanistan. An Obama Administration will work with other nations to strengthen their capacity to eliminate shared enemies.

White House 2 is a multi-partisan network of 10553 citizens imagining how the White House might work if it was run completely democratically by thousands of people over the internet. It's free and all U.S. citizens can join.

We're setting priorities, collaborating on policy, and creating a massive database of 2867 talking points covering all sides of every important issue facing our country. Watch the video intro.

Getting involved is easy and fun. Just join and start setting your priorities, like a todo list. The more people who endorse a priority, the higher it rises in the charts. The more people who join the network, the more clout we will have with the President and the media.